 |
to
content of issue |
Title |
Evidential Significance of the
Results of Investigative Activities:
Problems of Statutory Regulation and Practice of Law Enforcement
|
Authors |
Zuev Sergey Vasilievich,
Head of the Department of Criminal Law of South Ural State University, professor of
the Department of Law of Troitsk Branch of Chelyabinsk State University, PhD
Law. Office 109, 98, 454081, Chelyabinsk.
E-mail: zuevsergej@inbox.ru |
Section |
Civil and Criminal Procedure |
Issue |
2/2015 |
Page |
148—152
|
index UDC |
343.14 + 343.985
|
index LBC |
|
Abstract |
The author analyzes the regulation
and practice of using the results of investigative activities as evidence in criminal
proceedings. The author also notes conflicting views of scholars and
practitioners on the problem. Certain attention is drawn to the fact that without
the use of the results of investigative activities
in many cases it is impossible to
determine the full range of circumstances which are subject to proof, as well as all
the participants in the offense. The article studies judicial practice and
identifies some of its disadvantages as well as advantages in proving in criminal
cases with the use of operational materials. It is proposed to solve the problem
by introducing amendments to the content of the article 89 of the Criminal
procedural Code of the Russian Federation. |
Keywords |
investigative activity, proof, criminal procedure,
jurisprudence, use. |
 |
You can access full text version of
the article |
 |
to
content of issue |
|