|
|
 |
to
content of issue |
|
Title |
The notions “prevention”, “precautions”
and “counteraction” in legal discourse |
|
Authors |
Goloschapova Tatiana Gennadievna
Cand. Sc.
Philology, Associated
Professor of the Faculty of Law Enforcement Training
of the Federal State Budgetary
Educational Institution South Ural State University
(National Research University).
76, Lenina Av., 454080, Chelyabinsk. E-mail:
vasilisa5312@rambler.ru
Golosc hapov Evgeny
Vladimirovich
Cand. Sc. Law, Deputy Director
of the Operative Administration, Head of the
Department of the Organization
of Operational Investigations of the Head Department
of Federal Service for
the Execution of Sanctions in Chelyabinsk Region.
116, 3 Internatsionala Str.,
454090, Chelyabinsk. E-mail: vasilisa5312@rambler.ru |
|
Section |
Criminal legal doctrine |
|
Issue |
1/2014 |
Page |
85-87 |
index UDC |
343.01 + 343.9 + 343.85 |
index LBC |
Х02 + Х5 |
|
Abstract |
The article considers the problems concerning the
terminological conceptual field connected with the
counteraction against criminal acts (prevention,
precau-tions, etc.). Based on the data from
linguistic and legal dictionaries of modern Russian,
as well as on the analysis of legal literature
concerning the use of the above mentioned notions
the authors dwell on their good use taking into
account the individual lexical meaning. Moreover,
the notions ‘prevention’, ‘precautions’, and ‘counteraction’,
etc. are synonyms and in the process of legal
communication can be used as equal and stylistically
coloured. |
|
Keywords |
prevention, precautions, counteraction, preclusion,
crime, of-fence. |
|
 |
You can access full text version of
the article |
|
|
to
content of issue |
|
